Memory as a discursive Action: Commission of the present causes and situations of violence 1958, a policy for oblivion
Cargando...
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Industrial de Santander
Resumen
Descripción
El artículo busca exponer la configuración discursiva de la violencia en el país a través de la primera comisión de 1958; entendiendo las comisiones como instrumentos narrativos de la violencia en el país. Posicionando un discurso desde la oficialidad, el cual ha construido unas memorias sobre el pasado, asignándole unas nociones de verdad y unos usos políticos a estas narrativas.
Se utilizó la categoría de memoria como acción discursiva de Isabel Piper, categoría que busca entender el “Qué” y el “Cómo” de la memoria. En cuanto a lo metodológico, se utilizó el trabajo de archivo, tomando como fuentes documentos oficiales desde 1954 hasta 1958, además de analizar algunos diarios de circulación masiva.
El artículo aborda tres momentos, el primero hace referencia a la construcción conceptual, el segundo a la construcción del discurso sobre la violencia durante el gobierno de Gustavo Rojas Pinilla; el cual estableció las bases para la comprensión de la violencia y el último momento aborda el trabajo de la comisión de 1958, analizando las tramas y los discursos que giraban a su alrededor para darle un sentido a la violencia, movilizando una memoria del olvido que sirvió como base para consolidar el proyecto del Frente Nacional.
The article seeks to expose the discursive configuration of violence in the country through the first commission of 1958; understanding the commissions as narrative instruments of violence in the country. Positioning a discourse from the officers, which has built memories about the past, assigning some notions of truth and political uses to these narratives. The memory category was used as a discursive action by Isabel Piper, a category that seeks to understand the “What” and the “How” of memory. Regarding the methodological, the archive work was used, taking as sources official documents from 1954 to 1958, in addition to analyzing some newspapers with mass circulation. The article addresses three moments, the first refers to the conceptual construction, the second to the construction of the discourse on violence during the government of Gustavo Rojas Pinilla; which established the bases for the understanding of violence and the last moment addresses the work of the 1958 commission, analyzing the plots and discourses that revolve around it to give meaning to violence, mobilizing a memory of oblivion that served as a basis to consolidate the project of the “Frente Nacional”.
The article seeks to expose the discursive configuration of violence in the country through the first commission of 1958; understanding the commissions as narrative instruments of violence in the country. Positioning a discourse from the officers, which has built memories about the past, assigning some notions of truth and political uses to these narratives. The memory category was used as a discursive action by Isabel Piper, a category that seeks to understand the “What” and the “How” of memory. Regarding the methodological, the archive work was used, taking as sources official documents from 1954 to 1958, in addition to analyzing some newspapers with mass circulation. The article addresses three moments, the first refers to the conceptual construction, the second to the construction of the discourse on violence during the government of Gustavo Rojas Pinilla; which established the bases for the understanding of violence and the last moment addresses the work of the 1958 commission, analyzing the plots and discourses that revolve around it to give meaning to violence, mobilizing a memory of oblivion that served as a basis to consolidate the project of the “Frente Nacional”.