Publicación: From readings to collective production. Writings from critical and socio-subjective reflection towards an innovative sentipensar in Social Science. A South-Patagonian approach
Portada
Cargando...
Citas bibliográficas
Gestores Bibliográficos
Indexadores
Código QR
Autor corporativo
Recolector de datos
Otros/Desconocido
Director audiovisual
Editor
Universidad Industrial de Santander
Fecha
Citación
Título de serie/ reporte/ volumen/ colección
Es Parte de
Descripción
En el presente trabajo se realiza una revisión crítica en nuestros hitos significativos en pos de incorporar una nueva mirada acerca de los sujetos en el territorio y los procesos de conocimiento en torno a sus realidades. La propia vida cotidiana adquiere relevancia epistémica y se pone en juego a la hora de pensar nuestras trayectorias investigativas y las maneras de construir conocimiento. Compartimos vivencias, dolores, alegrías, frustraciones y, en el proceso, fuimos profundizando en la manera en que impactaron nuestra manera de comprender el mundo y comprendernos en el mundo. Buscamos “entrar en diálogo” con aspectos poco advertidos en el campo académico signado por las lógicas de producción y reproducción fuertemente academicista. Para ello se tomaron en consideración los siguientes ejes emergentes en el diálogo: a) Lecturas; que nos acompañaron tempranamente b) Énfasis en la diferencia porque nos percibimos diferentes en tanto podemos advertir formas particulares de ser-en-el-mundo; c) Apoyaturas porque hubo muchos “otros” que nos brindaron “partes de sí” en pos de impulsarnos hacia adelante; c) Formas diversas de construcción de los roles profesionales, ya que nuestras vivencias nos interpelan a construir nuevas formas de actuación dada la complejidad de nuestros contextos latinoamericanos; d) Nuestra manera de conectarnos con la investigación como práctica situada.
In this paper we critically review our significant milestones to incorporate a new look at the subjects in the territory and the processes of knowledge around their realities. Everyday life itself acquires epistemic relevance and it is at stake when thinking about our own research trajectories and methods to build knowledge. We shared experiences, pains, joys, frustrations and, during the process, we delved into the manner they impacted our way of understanding the world. We seek to "enter into dialogue" with little noticed aspects in the academic field marked by the logics of production and strongly academic reproduction. To this end, the following emerging axes were taken into account in the dialogue: a) Readings; that accompanied us early b) Emphasis on difference because we perceive ourselves different as well as we can notice particular ways of being-in-the-world; c) Support because there were many "others" who provided us "parts of themselves" to encourage us forward; d) Different considerations of constructing professional roles, since our experiences challenge us to build new forms of action due to the complexity of our Latin-American contexts; e) Our way of connecting with research as a situated practice.
In this paper we critically review our significant milestones to incorporate a new look at the subjects in the territory and the processes of knowledge around their realities. Everyday life itself acquires epistemic relevance and it is at stake when thinking about our own research trajectories and methods to build knowledge. We shared experiences, pains, joys, frustrations and, during the process, we delved into the manner they impacted our way of understanding the world. We seek to "enter into dialogue" with little noticed aspects in the academic field marked by the logics of production and strongly academic reproduction. To this end, the following emerging axes were taken into account in the dialogue: a) Readings; that accompanied us early b) Emphasis on difference because we perceive ourselves different as well as we can notice particular ways of being-in-the-world; c) Support because there were many "others" who provided us "parts of themselves" to encourage us forward; d) Different considerations of constructing professional roles, since our experiences challenge us to build new forms of action due to the complexity of our Latin-American contexts; e) Our way of connecting with research as a situated practice.