Publicación: Oralidad testimonial, usos y recursos. Transdisciplinariedad y construcción social de conocimientos
Portada
Cargando...
Citas bibliográficas
Gestores Bibliográficos
Indexadores
Código QR
Autor corporativo
Recolector de datos
Otros/Desconocido
Director audiovisual
Editor
Universidad Industrial de Santander
Fecha
Citación
Título de serie/ reporte/ volumen/ colección
Es Parte de
Descripción
Esta disertación da cuenta de una experiencia docente al nivel posgradual en Chiapas, vinculada a los programas Maestría en Estudios Culturales y Doctorado en Estudios Regionales, ambos adscritos al padrón PNPC del CONACyT en México. Refiere la importancia técnico-metodológica de la Oralidad Testimonial en las ciencias humanas y sociales, y el uso amplio del recuerdo, la rememoración y la memoria, en la historia, la antropología, la sociología y demás estudios socioculturales.
Aboga por el abandono de los estancos monodisciplinares y por una oralidad sin adjetivos. Plantea la necesaria transdisciplinariedad de los recursos de la memoria individual y colectiva; desde la comprensión, conceptualización y aplicación de sus contenidos al ámbito investigacional. Describe el proceso que va desde las marcas o inscripciones de la experiencia humana en la memoria individual y su conversión en memoria colectiva, hasta su evocación, rearticulación, recordación y “trabajo de memoria”. Y su dicción o deposición mediante los registros de la oralidad.
Plantea la necesidad de generalizar la aplicación de este programa transdisciplinario al conjunto de las investigaciones socioculturales del área, describe sus partes constitutivas y de forma anexa despliega el programa académico, en sus unidades, contenidos y materiales de consulta.
This dissertation features a postgraduate teaching experience in Chiapas. Linked to the programs of the Master of Cultural Studies and the Ph.D. in Regional Studies, both attached to the PNPC register from CONACyT in Mexico. It concerns the technical-methodological importance of testimonial orality in human and social sciences, as well as the broad usage of memories, remembrance and the memory in history, anthropology, sociology and other sociocultural studies. It advocates for both the abandonment of the isolated mono-disciplinary approach and for an orality without adjectives. It presents the necessary transdisciplinarity from resources of individual and collective memory; from the comprehension, conceptualization and implementation of their contents to the research field. It describes the process which goes from the marks or inscriptions of the human experience in the individual memory and its transformation into collective memory to its evocation, rearticulation, remembrance and “memory work.” And its diction or deposition through the records from orality. It presents the need to generalize the implementation of this transdisciplinary program to the entire field of sociocultural studies in the field. It describes its constitutive elements and additionally unfolds the academic program in its units, contents and reference materials.
This dissertation features a postgraduate teaching experience in Chiapas. Linked to the programs of the Master of Cultural Studies and the Ph.D. in Regional Studies, both attached to the PNPC register from CONACyT in Mexico. It concerns the technical-methodological importance of testimonial orality in human and social sciences, as well as the broad usage of memories, remembrance and the memory in history, anthropology, sociology and other sociocultural studies. It advocates for both the abandonment of the isolated mono-disciplinary approach and for an orality without adjectives. It presents the necessary transdisciplinarity from resources of individual and collective memory; from the comprehension, conceptualization and implementation of their contents to the research field. It describes the process which goes from the marks or inscriptions of the human experience in the individual memory and its transformation into collective memory to its evocation, rearticulation, remembrance and “memory work.” And its diction or deposition through the records from orality. It presents the need to generalize the implementation of this transdisciplinary program to the entire field of sociocultural studies in the field. It describes its constitutive elements and additionally unfolds the academic program in its units, contents and reference materials.