EL ERROR EN FILOSOFÍA: EL CASO DE DAVID HUME
Cargando...
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Industrial de Santander
relationships.isAdvisorOf
relationships.isEvaluatorOf
Resumen
Descripción
RESUMENEn el marco de la filosofía del conocimiento de David Hume se considera lasiguiente tesis: Hume circunscribe su análisis de las bases del conocimientoempírico al ideal racionalista del conocimiento. Es esto lo que se considerapropiamente como un error. En otras palabras, Hume supone, para el análisisdel conocimiento de la experiencia, cánones que van más allá de la experienciamisma: Este ensayo muestra detenidamente cómo se da lo anterior en loscambios entre el Tratado de la Naturaleza Humana y la Investigación sobreel conocimiento humano.
ABSTRACTIn the framework of the knowledge philosophy of David Hume, the nextthesis is considered: Hume circumscribes his analysis of the bases of theempirical knowledge to the knowledge rationalistic ideal. It is what isconsidered properly like a rnistake. In other words, Hume supposes for theanalysis of the experience knowledge, canons that go further the sameexperience. This essay shows thoroughly how this previous thesis isobserved in the changes between a treatise of the human nature and enquiryconcerning the human understanding.
ABSTRACTIn the framework of the knowledge philosophy of David Hume, the nextthesis is considered: Hume circumscribes his analysis of the bases of theempirical knowledge to the knowledge rationalistic ideal. It is what isconsidered properly like a rnistake. In other words, Hume supposes for theanalysis of the experience knowledge, canons that go further the sameexperience. This essay shows thoroughly how this previous thesis isobserved in the changes between a treatise of the human nature and enquiryconcerning the human understanding.