La interpretación y el psicoanálisis
No Thumbnail Available
Date
Authors
Advisors
Evaluators
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Industrial de Santander
Abstract
Description
Al hablar de interpretación no se trata sólo de observar una mera coincidencia léxica, es decir, designar con la misma palabra "interpretación", actos que si bien tienen diferencias, no tendrían entre sí una estructura común, sino que la interpretación remite esencialmente a considerar ese carácter de ser seres de lenguaje; condición que conduce a pensar que comúnmente nos movemos en hechos y situaciones que nos obligan a vivir en un ejercicio constante de interpretación. En tal sentido el presente texto atiende, desde la teoría psicoanalítica, algunas preguntas a partir de las cuales se puede adelantar una aproximación a aquello que indica e implica interpretar. Una, quizá central, puede exponerse así: ¿Es lícito, como algunos lo suponen, restringir la noción de interpretación a ser un acto especial, aun especializado, propio de algunos saberes y disciplinas, específico de ciertas patologías, o para ciertas situaciones y que ha de darse sólo para determinados hechos, pero no para todos?
On speaking of interpretation it is not a matter of noticing a plain lexical coincidence, in other words, designating with the same word "interpretation", acts that even though their differences, they don't have a common structure among themselves, but the interpretation essentially addresses to consider that character of being languages beings; the condition heretofore stated leads to think that we commonly move around facts and situations that make us to live in a constantly interpretation exercise. In that sense, the current text attends, from the psychoanalytic theory, some questions from which it can be possible to make an approximation to what indicates and implies the meaning of interpretation. One of them, perhaps the core of all, might be stated as follows: Is it permissible, as suppose by some, to restring the concept of interpretation to an special act, even specialized, own of some learning and disciplines, specific of certain pathologies, or certain situations and that must take place only for particular facts, but not for all?
On speaking of interpretation it is not a matter of noticing a plain lexical coincidence, in other words, designating with the same word "interpretation", acts that even though their differences, they don't have a common structure among themselves, but the interpretation essentially addresses to consider that character of being languages beings; the condition heretofore stated leads to think that we commonly move around facts and situations that make us to live in a constantly interpretation exercise. In that sense, the current text attends, from the psychoanalytic theory, some questions from which it can be possible to make an approximation to what indicates and implies the meaning of interpretation. One of them, perhaps the core of all, might be stated as follows: Is it permissible, as suppose by some, to restring the concept of interpretation to an special act, even specialized, own of some learning and disciplines, specific of certain pathologies, or certain situations and that must take place only for particular facts, but not for all?
Keywords
interpretación, psicoanálisis, lenguaje, respuesta, palabra, interpretation, psychoanalysis, language, answer, word