Publicación: THE PROFILE'S ARCHIVIST: THE DILEMMAS OF DOCUMENT EVALUATION
Portada
Cargando...
Citas bibliográficas
Gestores Bibliográficos
Indexadores
Código QR
Autor corporativo
Recolector de datos
Otros/Desconocido
Director audiovisual
Editor
Universidad Industrial de Santander
Fecha
Citación
Título de serie/ reporte/ volumen/ colección
Es Parte de
Descripción
El siguiente artículo propone una reflexión en torno al doble rol que cumplen los archivistas en lo relacionado a la valoración documental. El primer rol está relacionado con los procesos técnicos, especialmente en los escenarios empresariales donde la Gestión del Conocimiento ha tenido últimamente una importante participación; el segundo rol, por otro lado, se vincula con la sensibilidad social e histórica que debe asumir el archivista como gestor de la memoria colectiva. Ambos aspectos, a mi modo de ver, caracterizan a un archivista integral; no obstante, hay aspectos éticos que parecen distanciarlos. Estos matices complejizan la labor del profesional de la Archivística, quien en últimas, a pesar del filtro científico a que ha sometido sus criterios personales, juzgará por medio de la valoración documental aquello que la sociedad debe y no debe recordar.
The following article proposes a reflection on the dual role played by archivists in relation to the evaluation the documents. The first role is related to technical processes, especially in corporates scenarios where Knowledge Management has lately had an important participation; the second role, on the other hand, is linked to the social and historical sensitivity to assume the archivist as a manager collective memory. Both aspects, in my view, should characterize a complete archivist, however, there are ethical issues that seem far apart. These nuances complicate the work of professional Archivist, who ultimately, despite scientific filter to have submitted their personal criteria, judged by the documental value what society should and should not remember.
The following article proposes a reflection on the dual role played by archivists in relation to the evaluation the documents. The first role is related to technical processes, especially in corporates scenarios where Knowledge Management has lately had an important participation; the second role, on the other hand, is linked to the social and historical sensitivity to assume the archivist as a manager collective memory. Both aspects, in my view, should characterize a complete archivist, however, there are ethical issues that seem far apart. These nuances complicate the work of professional Archivist, who ultimately, despite scientific filter to have submitted their personal criteria, judged by the documental value what society should and should not remember.