Criterios sobre la oposición en Colombia
No Thumbnail Available
Date
Authors
Advisors
Evaluators
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Industrial de Santander
Abstract
Description
Se aborda el estudio de la oposición en Colombia, buscando no solo su significado sino también la tipología y el desarrollo histórico, pretendiendo determinar un marco metodológico y conceptual de su dinámica. La oposición con su función de limitar y controlar el poder tiene como sustento legítimo el ejercicio de la libertad, y por ende toda limitación a su práctica sería un atentado contra esta "sustancia" de la democracia, Asimismo, se plantea cómo el bipartidismo no generó oposición sino que por el contrario cerró la posibilidad de su pleno desarrollo formal; siendo cubierta de un lado por las disidencias de los partidos y, de otro, por la oposición popular, que se transformaría, por momentos, en revolucionaria.
SummaryThis article seeks to explain the study of the political opposition in Colombia, not only through its meaning but through its types and historical development, with the intention of determining its dynamics from a conceptual and methodological frame. The political opposition as a function to limit and control the power is based on the exercise of freedom. Any limitation to this freedom will be attempting against this "Substance" of democracy. Moreover, it outlines how the political bipartisanism dis not generate political opposition, On the contrary, it closed any possibility of its whole development. It appears, as the dissidence of the political parties, on the one hand, and a popular opposition, later on, a revolutionary opposition, on the other hand.
SummaryThis article seeks to explain the study of the political opposition in Colombia, not only through its meaning but through its types and historical development, with the intention of determining its dynamics from a conceptual and methodological frame. The political opposition as a function to limit and control the power is based on the exercise of freedom. Any limitation to this freedom will be attempting against this "Substance" of democracy. Moreover, it outlines how the political bipartisanism dis not generate political opposition, On the contrary, it closed any possibility of its whole development. It appears, as the dissidence of the political parties, on the one hand, and a popular opposition, later on, a revolutionary opposition, on the other hand.